Voices in Afghanistan say…

COVID-19, the vaccine roll-out and the future of government

‘Covid-19 has had a very bad effect on our community’

I got Covid-19. I lost my sense of taste, smell and my body became very weak for about 2 months. 

Nematullah Ahangosh
My mother was infected ten months ago. When winter arrived, my mother’s health got worse due to the burning of coal in my community. We had to take my mother to Pakistan where the weather is better during the winter. By some miracle, my mother is now able to walk. She is still recovering.

I could see how hard it was for everyone. My family stayed at home and couldn’t work and we didn’t know what to do. Our neighbours were saying that we will die of hunger before coronavirus gets to us … we were worried about food. After two months, they were saying we should go and find a bit of work to buy bread.

Abdul Ghafoor
The pandemic has made the poor even poorer than they were due to lack of support from the government and aid agencies. People could only stay in quarantine for short periods and had to get out of their homes to find a means of survival.

‘The vaccine has been stolen’

India is the only country so far that has donated supplies of vaccine. The vaccine program is very limited, and in contrast to other countries in the world, it’s mainly those in the government who receive the vaccine. I hardly know any common civilian who has been vaccinated. 

This vaccine distribution was very clearly meant for the people. Unfortunately here the vaccine is stolen by the powerful government.

Here the government doesn’t care about those who don’t have enough for their basic needs.

‘The government doesn’t know how to handle the situation in a better way.’

I’m not very optimistic about the vaccine program in Afghanistan for several reasons.
First, the current government does not help minorities. Ghani only helps his circle of favourite people. 
Second, the government does not know how or is unwilling to handle the situation in a better way. They might sell vaccines to the black market just like they did with the ventilators. 
Thirdly, recent clashes like this recent one in Behsud village in which a government helicopter was allegedly shot down by local guerrillas, create a climate of uncertainty and fear which makes roll out of the vaccine even harder. 

‘No less than a disaster’
A future government that includes Taliban would be no less than a disaster, but the current government under hasn’t left any reasons for the Afghans to love them either. Most people are so tired of Ghani’s policies, they would rather live under the Taliban than Ghani, not because they like the Taliban, but they might act much better than Ghani. Ghani has made discrimination and racism against certain ethnic groups systematic and therefore has promoted division among different ethnicities in Afghanistan.
I am not optimistic about that government since Taliban ideology [adheres very strictly] to religious and cultural norms that do not respect or care about democratic values nor consider women’s rights.
If the Taliban rule in Afghanistan, life will be very difficult for the people of Afghanistan, especially women and girls, I hope the world will hear our voice and we can have a democratic government.

‘Ghani’s government has failed to protect its citizens’
Ghani’s government has failed to protect its citizens. It is not capable of controlling the turmoil. Ghani has also made the situation worse. Every six months or so, he changes the positions of ministers, generals and other subordinates. He doesn’t have the support of the citizens.

Meanwhile, the Taliban continue their warfare. According to a recent survey of Pajwok News Agency, the Taliban control over 52% of the whole country. So, a future government that includes the Taliban is coming. It’s hard for me to trust either the current government or the future one which includes the Taliban, since both have targeted civilians. 

I think the future government should protect the rights of women, children and minorities. Otherwise, history will repeat itself once again and Afghanistan will come to fight another civil war.

Will drones really protect us?

Drugs, Surveillance & The War on Terror

By Maya Evans

Maya Evans on the seafront in Hastings. She is wearing sports clothes, kneeling on one knee, raising her left fist and holding a banner saying, 'Hastings welcomes refugees'
Maya Evans on the seafront in Hastings. She is kneeling on one knee and holding a banner saying, ‘Hastings welcomes refugees’

I’m seated in the police Zoom briefing with other council representatives for my small, seaside town, Hastings. The Chief Inspector is telling us about the crisis we have with soaring heroin addiction in the town. The recent surge is contributing to a general increase in crime. The next section of the briefing is about the future use of police surveillance drones, and how they could become useful in combatting crime.  

A few months ago, Nigel Farage arrived in Hastings to film himself on our tourist beaches, aiming to drum up hate and hostility toward migrants and refugees arriving in the UK, having just traversed the English Channel in precarious inflatables. Farage complains that the new arrivals are taking up hotel spaces. He triggers the public by saying it’s all coming out of the public purse, we can’t afford to look after our own citizens let alone refugees, and that these people will one day take their homes and jobs. The Home Office considers proposals to use watercannons on the migrant sea crossers, while Home Secretary, Priti Patel suggests the transportation of migrants and refugees to Ascension Island in the South Pacific, harking back to the 18thcentury, when Britain deported convicts to the penal colony of Australia. 

The British Army Watchkeeper drone has been commissioned to help with surveillance of people crossing the Channel. The Watchkeeper was initially developed when the British military requested £1 billion to develop a military drone. An Israeli arms company, Elbit Systems, was awarded the contract to design and develop the drone. When completed in 2014, it was transported to Afghanistan for ‘field testing’.

Was a ‘field testing’ in Afghanistan part of the tragic mistake made when a U.S. weaponized drone killed my friend Raz Mohammed’s brother-in-law and five of his friends? The young men were enjoying an early evening gathering in their orchard in Wardak province Afghanistan. All the men were unarmed, none of them were involved with the Taliban. Their instant deaths were the result of a ‘signature strike’ – a targeted killing based on racial profiling, the men ‘fitted’ the demographic of the Taliban – they were wearing Pashtoon clothing, in a Pashtoon village, men of fighting age – that was enough to get them killed.

Our local Chief Inspector finishes talking about police surveillance drones. At present, in my area of  Sussex, they are mainly using surveillance drones for traffic and ‘operations’, though elsewhere in the UK they have so far been used to survey a Black Lives Matter protest and another at an immigration centre.  Knowing how I would come across to others in the Zoom room, I decided to take the risk of sounding like a ‘conspiracy loon’ and plunged in – I highlighted the military method of ‘racial profiling’ during surveillance and targeted assassinations, how the US police have started using drones armed with non-lethal weapons (tasers, pepper spray, rubber bullets) against their own civilians, often anti-war, environmental and anti-racist protestors. The chief inspector was a little taken aback but quickly started to respond that British police were not like the military or the US police, that drones are really useful for helping lost people on mountain tops, and that having a drone operator walking around town, while flying a surveillance drone, would be great for community engagement. 

I suddenly recollect a fight which broke out in our town centre and wonder how a drone would have helped. Some sort of argument had arisen amongst the ‘street community’, a mixture of people who gravitate on the street to drink, to buy or take heroin and crack, or wait for their methadone subscription from the local rehab centre based above an arcade of shops which shadows the street community and the raucous outbreak. Shoppers walked past, some looking at the commotion, others head down, not wanting to inadvertently get dragged into a drug fueled hullabaloo. A young woman, weathered skin, tattered clothing, decaying teeth, aged beyond her years screams obscenities at another member of the community. Her gaunt face reminded me of the heroin addicts I have seen in Kabul, the people who live under a bridge, huddled in small groups, heads under a scarf as they cook up opium on a spoon. Their eyes are distant – friends and family say they are gone.   

Heroin addiction in impoverished British towns has soared in the last 10 years. At the crime briefings I attend as a Councillor, no one ever talks about where this cheap high-quality opium has flooded in from, the root cause probably considered ‘too political’. But in reality, heroin supply to Britain has careened in the last decade, namely due to the ‘solar revolution’ in Afghanistan. This has enabled farmers to use electricity generated from solar panels to pump untapped water from 100 meters under the desert. Now, where there was once an arid dust belt, there are now fields of thriving poppy, punches of colour lighting up the desert, too much of a lucrative cash crop for Afghan farmers to pass up. 

Many of the newly blooming fields are in Helmand, the Afghan province where Britain was assigned to fight the Taliban. Britain was also delegated, at the 2001 International Bonn Conference on Afghanistan, the responsibility of counter narcotics in Afghanistan. Considering Afghanistan was the first country in the world where weaponized drones were used – the 2001 unsuccessful assassination of Osama Bin Laden – and there after used as a “playground for foreign nations to kill Afghans like a video game” – as one of my young Afghan friends once described to me; it’s highly unlikely British Intelligence Agencies were unaware of the newly blossoming industry, much of which is growing in Helmand, a ‘hotspot’ for drone strikes and aerial surveillance. Today Afghanistan produces 90% of the worlds’ heroin, 3% of the Afghan population are addicts, and production of the crop has more than doubled, from 3,700 tonnes in 2012, to 9,000 tonnes in 2017. 

And so, in my home town, deprivation, crime, conflict and all the ills associated deepen. Drones are sent in to ‘solve’ the problem. To date, at least 40 UK police forces have either purchased a drone or have access to using one. In the area of Sussex and Surrey, there are 23 drones and, according to a recent Freedom of Information, they were used 108 times between January- June 2020.

Afghans are amongst the refugees washed up upon our beaches in flimsy dinghies, their channel crossing overseen by the very same Watchkeeper drone used to exacerbate war which drove them from their homeland. The most vulnerable in our society, from Britain to Afghanistan, are seized by the scourge of heroin and the conflagration of violence caused by war. The vaunted “eyes in the skies,” the surveillance drones, won’t help us understand these realities. The proliferation of weaponized drones will unleash more misery.

Momentum for campaigns to ban land mines, cluster bombs and nuclear weapons began with grassroots efforts to tell the truth about militarism and war. I hope a surveillance drone will get the message painted on large banners we’ve held, standing along our seacoast, proclaiming a welcome for refugees and a longing for peace.